Comments on Profile Post by smeags

  1. Basilbac
    Basilbac
    *Deletes smeags forums account* Mwahahaha
    Nov 16, 2014
  2. smeags
    smeags
    >:o
    I still live though. ;D
    Nov 16, 2014
  3. Basilbac
    Basilbac
    Really dare to try meh?
    Nov 16, 2014
  4. smeags
    smeags
    You can't exactly murder someone by deleting a forums account...
    Nov 16, 2014
  5. Basilbac
    Basilbac
    Erm.. well.. Err.. You dont know that cuz umm.. OH! If it happened you wouldnt know! Ha!
    Nov 16, 2014
  6. smeags
    smeags
    I think I would know if I died. To start with, I wouldn't know. ;)
    Its the ultimate fail safe.
    Nov 17, 2014
  7. Basilbac
    Basilbac
    Mhm, so i could (and possibly have) murder(ed) you and you/others wouldnt even know.
    Nov 17, 2014
  8. smeags
    smeags
    You don't get the point. If I didn't know, then I would know, which is why its a failsafe.
    Nov 17, 2014
  9. Basilbac
    Basilbac
    But if you knew, then you wouldn't not know, which means that therefore you are proving yourself wrong.
    Nov 17, 2014
  10. smeags
    smeags
    But then if I did not know (if I was dead I wouldn't know anything) it would cause me to know, proving me right.
    Nov 17, 2014
  11. Basilbac
    Basilbac
    But if you didnt know anything then you wouldnt be able to know that so youd know nothing proving ME right
    Nov 17, 2014
  12. smeags
    smeags
    How would not knowing make me incapable of knowing something after that? Hmm? It doesn't, now if I had another fail safe trigger, it would cause me to remember, proving ME. right once more.
    Nov 17, 2014
  13. Basilbac
    Basilbac
    But what if i disabled the fail safe, therefore making you knowing about not knowing about knowing about not knowing impeccable, so therefore it would prove ME right and you wrong
    Nov 17, 2014
  14. smeags
    smeags
    But your entire plan of proving yourself right hinges on the fact that you disable the fail safe. And todo that, you need to go through all 9000, beat all the fire walls and pie defendants to even look at the fail safes purpose, and then figure out the rubix cube lock I have on the disable selection. :)
    Nov 18, 2014
  15. Basilbac
    Basilbac
    Ah, but I've already done that-as a matter of fact, ive just displayed an illusion that i havent, meaning I'm right. You cant beat me
    Nov 18, 2014
  16. smeags
    smeags
    Oh really? There's been no entrances through the only door in the system, I have been doing scans every 0.121 seconds since 0100 hours, no anomalies, there is no way to breach the system without going through that particular door. Also, my central fail safe, which triggers when any other failsafes have been disrupted, is silent. So no, you're illusion is simply that, an illusion.
    Nov 18, 2014
  17. Basilbac
    Basilbac
    An illusion to your eyes only. You see, you suffer from multiple personality disorder or whatever, and i am merely you at another angle and vice versa. Therefore, I was so graceful as to cover my tracks so perfectly knowing exactly what you knew that I could place an illusion over it without even the smallest suspicion.
    Nov 18, 2014
  18. smeags
    smeags
    What you still do not realize, is I know this already. I have failsafes in place to alert me if these rampant copies of myself get out of hand. However, currently they are working in harmony. Your plan is elaborate, I give you that, but the failsafes are to numerous, to coordinated, and to disciplined. There is no hope for the fallen such as yourself.
    Nov 18, 2014
  19. Basilbac
    Basilbac
    Ah, but in order to protect it from me, you'd have to protect it from you. Anything you can do I can do and more, therefore, if you protected it from me (based upon your limitations) you would only block out yourself and would not be able to check to detect me for it would be mistaken for yourself. Therefore, once again, I'm right
    Nov 18, 2014
  20. smeags
    smeags
    But you are not me. I have already established that I know exactly who each of my personalities are. And you, Mr Baccouche, are not one of them.
    Nov 18, 2014
  21. Basilbac
    Basilbac
    Wrong again. I have hidden so well from you that in fact you can not detect me. Id advise you revamp security to give me a challenge. But then again, it'd be me revamping security
    Nov 18, 2014
  22. smeags
    smeags
    When shall you learn, you cannot pull of the illusion tactic you have been attempting the entire time. You are not me. There is no viable way that you could be me, with data programs that have scanned my very DNA and rendered me certain of the singularity of myself. So, if you would once again tell me how I can't possibly be right while I triangulate your position...
    Nov 18, 2014